“This is an
epic tale about a man who said he would stop the motor of the world – and did,”
is one of the blurbs on the “Atlas Shrugged” website. “A thrilling mystery
about what might happen if the world’s producers disappeared,” is another, and
a third: “A story that shows how ideas have the power to shape the world we
live in.”
Anyone who
has read the novel knows it’s long, 1,168pages, and about many things including
romance and sex. Its plot and theme, though, are essentially vehicles to
espouse, at least in my perspective, an ideology rather than philosophy. It’s
called “objectivism.” This ideology essential states that individuals should be
selfish and should never compromise – on anything.
Sort of
sounds familiar, doesn’t it? In fact, there are many, some of whom are in
government, who believe this. Some politicians believe some issues are so
sacrosanct that compromise is impossible. But there’s compromise, and then there’s
selling your soul for ambition and avarice.
As is commonly understood,
compromise is where parties, none of whom is entirely right or wrong on an
issue or in a dispute, give up something they believe in and accept something
they don’t (sacrificing?). They do this in order to move forward on finding a
common ground that would benefit the whole rather than the individual.
Good things have come from
compromise, like the United States Constitution and the Bill of Rights – each
filled with ideas from a lot of people who didn’t always agree but that have
nonetheless shaped the world.
In “Atlas
Shrugged,” Rand ’s hero, Galt, succeeds in
bringing the world to a halt in order to broadcast, using his technologically
advanced radio, the philosophy of objectivism. He is cheered by supporters who
believe the world will see the wisdom, adopt the philosophy, and life will be
good. People will go about doing what they want without interference or
critical appraisal from anyone, particularly the government.
That sounds
well and good for fiction, but it doesn’t seem to be a realistic way to go
about things like raising a family let alone running a government. But then,
who am I to say? In the words of Graham Green’s foible-prone Holly Martins, the
protagonist in “The Third Man,” I’m just a hack writer.
No comments:
Post a Comment