Friday, July 1, 2022
It Has Happened Here
Fascism can slither into a democracy unnoticed until a moment of social dysfunction, then it strikes hard, its poison seeping into the psyche of the nation as its political leaders struggle for constitutional coherence.
Despite his decisive election loss to Democrat Joe Biden, former President Donald Trump refused to relinquish power, and waged a deadly insurrection with an army of supporters on Jan. 6, 2021 to take control of the United States government before Biden was inaugurated.
This is fascism in 21st century America, where Trump, once considered a billionaire buffoon until he won the presidency in 2016, directed thousands of loyalists, many armed or ready to retrieve an arms cache nearby, to attack the U.S. Capitol and stop certification of the 2020 election.
Hundreds were injured, five people died and one woman was killed in the melee before the mob was turned back.Yet, 147 Republicans in the House and Senate still voted to overturn the election in favor of Trump, even after his loyalists destroyed property, beat police officers, and voted to hang Trump’s own vice president, Mike Pence.
Gallows for Pence on Jan. 2, 2021.
Credit: Tyler Merbler
Meanwhile, a presidential hopeful for 2024, Florida Republican Gov. Ron DeSantis, signs laws by a complicit Sunshine State legislature that dictate what school children and high schoolers should learn. Are checks and balances, one of democracy’s pillars, no longer valid there?
In Pennsylvania, Trump-endorsed Republican Doug Mastriano, a conservative Christian and ex-army officer, vows to disenfranchise voters if he becomes governor and doesn’t like the outcome of statewide elections. Mastriano was among those who marched on the Capitol Jan. 6.
Not since Huey Long of Louisiana has there been governors or candidates for governor willing to tear apart democracy to keep or get power. Long was a beloved populist with a fascist fist. As the Democratic and demagogic governor (and later U.S. senator), he ruled the Bayou State from 1928 to 1935 when he was assassinated at the state’s capitol.
The iron-fisted Long.
Credit: Library of Congress
The conservative wing of the Republican Party, having long desired to dictate social mores from the pulpit of government, finally succeeded after jerry-rigging the U.S. Supreme Court, which decided recently that women have no rights under the Constitution.
Five conservative justices took away a fundamental right of privacy under Roe v. Wade, thus effectively banning abortion. They also struck down a gun-safety law in New York and several other states that restricted gun owners from openly carrying weapons.
Justice Clarence Thomas who delivered the opinion on guns appears to have no problem with Trump’s armed insurrection, which his wife, Ginny, supported, if not helped organize.
Thomas said the court is now considering stripping more rights including same sex marriage. In the history of the United States, the Supreme Court has never taken away a constitutional right, but this court is only getting started. Thomas wants to nullify years of gun-safety laws.
This fall, fascist forces could succeed in controlling Congress. If Republicans win one or both houses, they have threatened to impeach Biden for no other reason than to impeach him. If that occurs, the coup Trump started on Jan. 6 becomes a fait accompli.
No matter who wins the presidential election in 2024, a conservative-controlled Supreme Court and a Republican Congress dominated by conservatives will maneuver to decide the winner.
In 1935, during the rise of fascism in Europe, writer Sinclair Lewis penned a novel about a fascist leader taking power in the United States, “It Could Happen Here.”
Since that period, fascist forces have banged at America’s door, and conservative politicians and religious-right leaders have tried to let them in, eager to serve their own self-interests and thirsts for power. Their wish appears on the verge of coming true. It has now happened here.
Some of the leading forces of fascism in this country have largely been conservative Catholics and evangelical Christians. From the anti-Semitic Father Charles Coughlin, who embraced fascism on his Detroit radio programs in the 1930s, to today’s Supreme Court Justices like Thomas, Samuel Alito, Brett Kavanaugh, Neil Gorsuch (now Episcopalian), Amy Coney Barrett and John Roberts.
Perhaps fascism’s absolutism resembles the dogma of religions like Catholicism and evangelical Christianity and that’s why churchgoers find appeal in both.
The three largest countries in Europe that turned to fascism in the 1930s were Catholic: Italy, led by Benito Mussolini; Germany, led by Adolf Hitler; and Spain, led by Francisco Franco.
While Mussolini and Hitler were raised Catholic neither man believed in their faith. They led the most brutal war in world history. Franco was a devout Catholic who, with Hitler’s help, waged a brutal Civil War (he stayed out of World War II), and then led an evil dictatorship for 39 years.
The five conservative justices who took away the right of a woman to choose her own health care based their ruling not on constitutional or even science-backed constitutional law. They based it on their religious beliefs. Could we be headed to a sort of Franco-theocratic rule?
If conservative Republicans manage to succeed in their fascist quest, their next task is re-writing the Constitution. They will surely take away more rights and eliminate the Establishment Clause that, at this tenuous moment, prevents the government from making religious-based laws.
Since 2014, 19 state legislatures – everyone one of them Republican controlled – have passed resolutions calling for a constitutional convention. Four – Wisconsin, Nebraska, West Virginia, South Carolina – did so this year. The effort is led by wealthy business conservatives such as Charles Koch.
Conservative Republicans claim they want to re-write the Constitution to reign in federal spending and limit government. That is devious. A convention will allow them to throw out our current Constitution for a document that could create an authoritarian government and restrict rights for everyone by heterosexual Christian whites.
Legal scholars have long warned of the dangers of a convention, particularly in an era so politically polarized as today.
As one former Supreme Court chief justice, Warren Burger, explained during his tenure on the court from 1969 to 1986, “there is no way to effectively limit or muzzle the actions of a Constitutional Convention. The Convention could make its own rules and set its own agenda. Congress might try to limit the convention to one amendment or one issue, but there is no way to assure that the Convention would obey.”
Conservative Associate Justice Antonin Scalia (yet another Catholic), who died in 2016, was even more succinct in his opinion: “I certainly would not want a constitutional convention. Whoa! Who knows what would come out of it?”
Wednesday, June 29, 2022
Trump's March on the Capitol
From the June 28 House hearings on the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection, former White House aide Cassidy Hutchinson provided details on former President Donald Trump’s insistence on joining his supporters as they left his rally outside the White House and marched on the U.S. Capitol.
Trump knew they were armed and told his aides he was not worried about getting injured by the mob, where five people were killed and hundreds injured that day. The Secret Service overruled the president and whisked him from the rally and back to the West Wing.
“’I’m the ‘effing’ president, take me to the Capitol,’” an infuriated Trump told one Secret Service, according to Hutchinson. She said Trump tried to attack the agent assigned to protect him.
So, the question: Why was Trump so insistent on joining the march that what we’ve now learned was part of the coup plot by the former president and his inner circle?
Perhaps the answer is found in the history of Italian and German fascism.
On Oct. 24, 1922, Benito Mussolini called at a rally of 60,000 fascist militants in Naples to march on Rome.
“Our program is simple: we want to rule Italy,” the soon-to-be fascist leader told the crowd.
Four days late, about 30,000 Black Shirts marched on Rome. Mussolini did not march with them, but made sure he got photographed with the marchers before they headed to the Capitol, where they planned to take power through an armed insurrection.
However, Italy’s King Victor Emmanuel III, fearing a civil war, capitulated to the marchers and handed power to Mussolini to avoid violence.
One year later, inspired by Mussolini’s march, Adolf Hitler and the nascent Nazi Party staged a coup attempt in Munich against Germany’s government, the Weimar Republic.
Unlike Mussolini, though, Hitler joined the 2,000 marchers in their infamous “Beer Hall Putsch,” which the police stopped after killing 16 Nazi Party members. Hitler escaped, but was caught two later, charged with treason.
Widely publicized, the trial gave Hitler a platform in which to spout nationalist sentiments, but he was found guilty and sent to prison for five years. He served nine months, during which time he wrote Mein Kampf.
Afterward, he returned to politics and within 10 years, thanks largely to a weak and ineffective Weimar government, Hitler was essentially handed the chancellorship after conservative leaders persuaded the ailing President Paul von Hindenburg to appoint him in 1933.
Once Mussolini and Hitler assumed power, fascism consumed every level of society and politics and the two leaders effectively extinguished any opposition to their rule through murder and terror.
An admirer of history’s authoritarian leaders, Trump may have considered these moments in history as he plotted his coup.
However, from what we watched in real time on Jan. 6 and what we’ve learned from the hearings – including Trump’s plotting with Congressman Scott Perry (R-Pa) to enter the House chamber (which could have been with armed insurrectionists) – his motive may have been darker.
Monday, June 13, 2022
The Sorrow
Among the endless news on the gun-front is that of a 10-year-old girl who shot and killed a woman because the woman was arguing with her mother. This occurred more than a week after the slaughter of 19 children and two teachers in Uvalde, Texas, and two weeks after the massacre of 10 African American grocery shoppers in Buffalo, New York by a white supremacist armed with the gun owners’ weapon of choice, the AR-15.
More horrific statistics about our nation that decades ago chose unbridled access to guns over the safety of its children. No other nation on Earth allows gun violence to go so unchecked.
Whatever legislative solutions Congress passes and the President signs won’t stop the violence. The gun industry, its subsidiaries and their customers will make sure of it. No one is safe from gun violence anymore, which is what the gun industry wanted—because more people will buy guns in fear of their safety, a safety that is not secured by gun ownership. Guns haven’t saved anyone from gun violence and Uvalde is yet another example.
Rampant gun deaths in the United States, now the leading cause of death in school children, is the fruit of a decision long supported by gun owners. For decades now, I have written about the need for gun control, to limit weapons used to “assault” (a word gun owners get angry when used) and kill large numbers of people. Initially, I blamed the National Rifle Association; the Gun Owners of America; and lawmakers, governors, and presidents (some too afraid or too bought by these group) for the slowly escalating violence.
And gun violence has been slowly escalating as states and Congress passed more and more promiscuous gun laws – conceal carry, open carry, “permitless” carry, eliminating assault weapon bans – while gun manufacturers not only sold more guns, but more powerful weapons. It’s like a frog in a pot of cold water on a stovetop burner, ignoring the danger as the water gradually heats to boiling. The nation is awash in guns, all kinds of guns, corresponding exactly with the gun violence that, with 250 mass shootings in the last month, has the nation boiling in death.
Government officials at federal, state and local levels, the NRA, and the GOA are certainly to blame, but so are the law-abiding gun owners (NRA, GOA members and non-members alike), as well as the media treating each mass shooting as an individual event instead of what they collective are—a narrative of denial and madness; religious leaders who are more interested in condemning people for their sexuality rather than their support of weapons of mass murder; the education system’s failure to muster the will to demand gun control; gun retailers and their failure to take background checks seriously, and voters who quickly lose interest.
In fact, there’s a lot of blame to go around, so much blame that no one individual and no one group can or will assume responsibility for the carnage. Until we all accept responsibility, until we all acknowledge there is no exception, no middle road, no two sides to the argument, that roiling cauldron will get hotter; more and more bodies of children, the elderly, anyone, will float to the top.
We all are in the line of fir—including citizens packing a weapon to protect themselves and those toxic personalities who like to threaten that if anyone takes their gun it will be from their “cold dead hands.” The years have seen a lot of cold dead hands. Their statistic is just as grim and is another contradiction to the “good guy with a gun” lie, particularly since there are many cases of “good guys” killing “good guys” with their legally acquired weapon. Or “good guys” killing or threatening their partner in domestic violence.
Like a deadly virus, no one knows what goes on in the minds and lives of all these “good guys.” They could perhaps angrily overreact (and who doesn’t do that?) and use their weapon in a burst of anger, something they may not normally do. They could experience a life event that stressed them to a breaking point and they begin firing. In fact, that’s exactly what some of the statistics show. Unfortunately, “good guys” with guns are just not, well, perfect, and ensuring a society safe from gun violence requires near perfection.
Guns are a disease in this country, the vaccine is gun control that would reduce the nearly 400 million guns infecting our society with violence and death. Gun control also needs to start the long-overdue process of changing mindsets through an honest reckoning with ourselves.
We have allowed 50 years of sloganeering about guns and distortions about the actual intent and purpose of the Second Amendment, which has poisoned thinking to a level where the nation’s view of life is callous and inhumane. Gun violence is a daily occurrence. We just shrug.
That is the sorrow of our age.
Saturday, May 28, 2022
Legalized Slaughter
Until the moment the shooters, armed for mass killing, entered the schools at Columbine High School, Sandy Hook Elementary, Marjory Stoneman Douglas High School and Robb Elementary in Uvalde, they had broken no laws.
For the last three decades, Republican-led legislatures and governors along with Republican-led Congresses and Presidents have passed and signed the most non-restrictive gun laws or blocked federal research into gun violence.
The result: gun-violence today is the leading cause of death in children; mass shooting deaths occur weekly, sometimes daily, and gun deaths, intentional or accidental are daily on average.
The National Rifle Association and the Gun Owners of America along with Republican and Democratic legislators at the state and federal levels have ensured the country is awash in guns, high-capacity weaponry built and designed to slaughter schools, classrooms, churches, grocery stores, parks, etc. Pick any place and it is a designated kill zone.
While the aforementioned are responsible for this carnage, there is another group that has so far escaped any scrutiny: the average gun owner.
And not just the gun owner who equates their manhood (or womanhood) with toting open and concealed handguns, hunting rifles and assault-style weapons such as the AR-15 that don’t care how many children are slaughtered by guns because they are confident in their ignorance about the Second amendment.
No, it is the gun owners who like to say they support common sense gun regulation, but never do anything about it other than to vote Republican (or Democrat, if the NRA approves).
We’ve seen mothers march and students march in support of reducing gun violence through such measures as eliminating high-capacity magazines and automatic and semi-automatic weapons; we’ve seen them march for universal background checks.
We’ve never seen gun owners for common-sense gun regulation march or give up their AR-15s, even though countless children and adults have given up their lives as bullets rip their flesh apart.
At this point, after the latest massacre of 19 children and two teachers by an 18-year-old with an AR-15, we can only believe that talk cheap for gun owners and so is life. Year after year, polls show an overwhelming majority of voters wants these and other gun reforms, yet nothing ever happens.
After all these years, and all these senseless gun deaths, gun owners have been getting away with murder by not accepting responsibility for their indirect, but supportive role in gun violence. Legislatures and Congresses have gone out of their way to protect them with one law after another that ensures they have amble weapons and ammunition with little fear of restrictions or law enforcement interference.
Not just politicians, judges and juries, too. Just one of the more recent examples is then 17-year-old Kyle Rittenhouse who intentionally shot three men, murdering two, but who a Wisconsin jury with the judge’s blessing, acquitted of all charges, despite overwhelming evidence.
For years, the NRA’s popular refrain against gun regulations was “guns don’t kill people, people kill people,” but now neither guns nor people kill because the laws of the land says so. America has legalized gun slaughter because gun owners love their guns more than their children.
Thursday, May 26, 2022
Fear and Self-Loathing
Until America reckons with slavery white supremacists will continue killing people of color and conservative Republicans will continue adopting laws and policies that block the actual history of this country.
As a middle-aged white male afforded opportunity and privilege in a white dominated society, I believe that reckoning is coming, and I believe that all white people know it, too. While some of us, or, as I like to believe, many of us, welcome that moment, other whites fear it.
It is a fear passed on since the end of the war that broke one chain of that abominable institution, a fear that has promulgated the other chains of slavery: Jim Crow, systemic racism, white supremacy and the violent ignorance it breeds.
It is a fear both political parties have exploited to gain power, to divide their opponents and thus the state, and to inflict harm on non-whites. For Democrats, it was in the 19th and 20th centuries, particularly those in the South who eventually became Dixiecrats when their party embraced Civil Rights. When voting rights legislation passed in the 1960s, they joined Republican conservatives.
The fear is familiar to everyone—an emotion that swirls deep, a nudging uncomfortable truth that we choose not to address to avoid the great responsibility of knowing, understanding, and acknowledging. It’s like looking in the mirror and realizing you’ve grown older, but not wiser; it’s the first-time hearing your recorded voice and realizing you don’t sound like you think you do.
Whites need to accept that racism exists like a virulent strain in this country, that it did not end with the election of President Barack Obama to the White House. In fact, Obama’s election stoked white fears about losing privilege (in the coming plurality I hope it’s shared among all races and tribes) and having to answer for America’s slave-holding past with reparations.
Indeed, on the eve of Obama’s election in 2008, a Republican conservative white woman of European background with whom I worked was in an absolute panic about soon having to pay reparations even though her family did not come to this country until the early 20th century.
Only someone privileged because she is a member of a racial majority would worry about that.
I’m sure that some whites worry about these things, which is why a concept called critical race theory, about this nation’s systemic racism discussed in some universities, was recently banned in the public schools of some GOP-controlled Southern states, even though it was never taught.
Curiously, those same states have not rushed to ban the teaching of the great replacement theory, a racist conspiracy Fox News’ Tucker Carlson and Republicans espouse.
What these whites fear most about a reckoning is the truth about how this nation was built—with the sweat, toil, ideas and visions of enslaved Black people; with the exploitation of other minorities of color. Their contributions were (and are) significant in making this country great.
The truth they fear is that whites today are the beneficiaries of slavery. They enjoy this benefit by largely by not accepting the truth that this country was born of slave-holding, which became an institution enshrined by the white men who founded it.
If the nation had reckoned with slavery in 1865, by building on the Emancipation Proclamation and re-building the South with equality for all, we might not feel the need to own guns today and thus not have mass shootings and mass deaths. Instead, our politics allowed hate to fester.
Within the core of the conservative movement there is self-loathing expressed through myraid policies and laws that are intended to harm Americans, from allowing more than 400 million weapons into the streets to voter suppression to banning abortion. Democracies are not about codifying grievances.
None of these laws help people or address an individual’s dignity or human rights. Despite that many of them were slave holders, the Founding Fathers crafted the Constitution to address human dignity, not provide a how-to-guide for living in a democracy; they left that up to future generations to determine.
Slavery is the greatest indignity that one human can do to another; forcing women to have children is another indignity. Both are violence against individuals.
Until the reckoning, we will suffer death and indignity.
Sunday, March 6, 2022
World at War
One week into Russia’s invasion of Ukraine, launching the largest military conflict in Europe since 1945, the world is again at war; and it appears the man who decided to wage aggression against his neighbor was not prepared for the response.
Yet, that is how conflicts of the 20th and 21st century typically begin, from World War I to World War II to the America-led invasion of Iraq to Vladimir Putin’s invasion today—never well thought out by the people eager to war, they dismiss evidence disputing their reasoning.
Consider Adolf Hitler’s grievances for invading his neighbors, his claim of protecting German minorities in Czechoslovakia and staging an “attack” by Polish soldiers; Lyndon Johnson’s Gulf of Tonkin incident to fight North Vietnam; elusive weapons of mass destruction in Iraq; and Putin’s bogus claim, among many, of de-Nazifying Ukraine whose president is Jewish.
None of those reasons are true or accurate, but it led, as it’s leading Putin today, into devastating wars that produced more harm than good, particularly for the aggressors. History has shown that no one escape war unscathed; whether its lives, property or psyche, the damage is lasting.
Apotheosis of War by Russian artist Vasily Vereshchagin (1842-1904)
Partly because Putin’s war is in Europe, and because Putin seemed to pull tactics from Hitler’s playbook for his reasoning to attack Ukraine, there have been allusions to World War II that lack the context of history.
Before the allies mustered the will to fight Germany and Japan, the international structure for cooperation among the world’s nations was weak, perhaps largely because the United States refused to join the League of Nations to avoid getting pulled into another World War I.
Today, strong international security organizations have so far kept a nuclear-tipped world from engulfing itself in flames the last 77 years—the United Nations and such regional alliances as the European Union and NATO, of which most members are Western European democracies.
However, since the end of the Cold War in 1989, former Warsaw Pact nations – Poland, Latvia, Lithuania, Estonia, Hungry, Czech Republic, Slovakia and Rumania – have joined NATO, which is another of Putin’s complaints based on delusional thinking.
Despite diplomacy and economic connections between Russia and NATO countries including the U.S., Putin believes (though it remains unclear whether he really believes this) that NATO is just waiting to invade Russia, hence his demand that Ukraine never be allowed to join NATO.
Western democracies worked with Russia within the NATO framework with hope the Russian federation would eventually become a member, but NATO severed ties in 2014 after Russia invaded and annexed Crimea. As an old communist, Putin laments the demise of the former Union of Soviet Socialist Republics, in which Russia controlled the Warsaw Pact, formed in direct response to NATO. In fact, both organizations once planned and conducted war games on how to repel the other, if either launched an invasion.
Putin’s war, which has put NATO and other world nations on high alert, is asymmetrical at the moment, running along an edge where it could tip into an abyss with armies of the West mobilizing for a conflagration that could become nuclear or towards an outcome that could put the region on a path toward real peace.
For now, the war is contained in Ukraine. Putin, angry at the failures of his military’s shortcomings and frustrated by Ukrainian resilience (See Hitler: Leningrad, Stalingrad, etc.), has sent Russian forces after non-military objectives – primarily residential buildings – to terrorize the population with brute force.
Thought outnumbered and outgunned, Ukrainian fighters have been astonishingly effective, inflicting heavy casualties on the invaders while some of the Russian soldiers captured expressing an unwillingness to fight their Slavic brothers and sisters.
With his tanks and bombs, Putin targets civilians, hoping for Ukraine’s inspirational President Volodymyr Zelensky to capitulate, but willing to scorch the country regardless.
In response, most of the world’s nations – including hundreds of thousands of Russian citizens – have called for Putin to end his war. Led by the United States, the West has imposed sanctions that crippled the Russian economy; it will take years for the country to recover financially.
None of this has stopped Putin. He wants to make this war about NATO and threatens to use nuclear weapons. Like Hitler, he seems willing to destroy his own country, which was Germany’s fate as the allies closed in, and Hitler committed suicide in a Berlin bunker.
The worry is whether Putin really believes his megalomaniacal dream of East Europe domination, of a restored USSR empire, is worth that.
It seems doubtful this war will lead to a nuclear exchange between Russia and the West, but if a desperate Putin resorts to detonating a weapon in Ukraine, what is the world’s response?
We can hope for the Russian people to rise up and topple Putin – who has started to shut down any dissent – but that seems uncertain. We can expect a bloody war and wonder—whether it ends with a truce, a mushroom cloud or in a bunker.
Saturday, January 22, 2022
Word to the Wise
In November 1800, on his second day in an Executive Mansion still under
construction, President John Adams wrote a letter to his wife, Abigail, that
included these words – "I pray Heaven to bestow the best of Blessings on this
House and on all that shall hereafter inhabit it. May none but honest and wise
Men ever rule under this roof."
In 1945, President Franklin Roosevelt
had those words inscribed in the fireplace mantle in the State Dining Room, where they remain today.
Since George Washington, the men who have run this country have neither been always
wise nor always honest, but they have been human, with behaviors good, bad,
indifferent and, in some cases, pathological.
Despite achieving through their ambition, drive and hard work the high office, what sets a President apart from
everyone else is the house they inhabit and the power the voters give them for a
brief period of time to administer a nation that remains a work in progress.
Government is not always answerable to the people (look at the latest failure
for voting rights), but this is what Americans cherish about democracy—casting a
vote for their candidate, from local tax collector to President, which makes
them a part of the government that serves them.
Deep within the American spirit is the firm belief that presidents are determined neither by divine right nor
wealth, but by every adult-age American registered to vote.
Voting today is under threat by anti-democratic forces unleashed by former Republican President
Donald Trump and his failed attempt to thwart the Constitution to keep his grip on power. No longer in power, Trump
now encourages lawmakers in state houses his party controls to draft and pass
laws to suppress, if not altogether deny, Americans their right.
No President in the history of the Republic attempted such autocratic moves and for such a petty
narcissistic reason—he was embarrassed to
look like a loser. That’s an autocratic trait that becomes increasingly dangerous when those
around the autocrat feed his narcissism.
Trump turned to
loyalists among his staff,
Congress,
state houses,
former and active military,
the judiciary,
law firms
and
the GOP
in his effort to steal the 2020 election. They spread disproven claims of voter fraud, swamped the courts with one
baseless lawsuit after another, and organized a coup attempt that left five
dead.
In contrast, Trump’s predecessors, whether they won or lost, relied on
their abiding faith in the will of the voters, the Constitution and the rule of
law. They also accepted their loss.
In light of the hundreds of investigations and arrests by the Justice Department
related to the Jan. 6, 2021 insurrection, and the hundreds of witnesses
interviewed by the
House’s January 6th Committee,
can we ever again expect, as Adams prayed, “honest and wise Men [and women]” to
occupy the White House?
That’s relative, of course, but what about future Oval
Office occupants?
Trump’s strongman approach has inspired like-minded candidates
for local, state and federal office. Since his 2016 election, Republican voters
seem to show preference for autocratic leaders who rule rather than democratic
leaders who govern. They should be careful what they wish for.
Preference for autocratic rule has simmered in the GOP for decades. Conservative congressional
members, governors and state and local elected officials started to show disdain
for democracy when they refused to accept the legitimate election of the first
African American as president, Barack Obama. Instead, they entertained
conspiracy theories about his birthplace.
It was not just his skin color that
riled them, but Obama’s election represented the progressive sentiment they
don’t want to admit
runs deep among voters.
Since the 1990s, GOP conservatives have struggled to reshape a nation that was forged through depression and war on Rooseveltian principles (that’s FDR and Teddy) that government would help ensure fairness and equality for all. New Deal
programs like Social Security and the Fair Labor Standards Act (provided the
minimum wage, banned child labor, etc.) ingrained that philosophy in federal
policy and the American mindset.
Unable to get a majority of American voters to
agree to
dismantling such programs, to returning to an era when business dictated to government what kind of
government voters would get, the GOP turned to building a conservative-dominant
Supreme Court that could help achieve what the party long sought, to
drown government “in the bathtub.”
In this effort, Republican leader and Kentucky Sen. Mitch McConnell ruptured
Senate rules and decorum to block Obama from appointing a justice, leaving a
vacancy for the next President, which McConnell hoped would not be a Democrat.
Seeing the chance to perhaps secure even more justices, he and the GOP went for
Trump, despite their grave doubts about the man.
As President, Trump was able to
appoint three conservative justices for a 6-3 majority that has demonstrated a
dislike for Rooseveltian principles. It recently overruled mandating vaccines in
the workplace, which means those who take measures to protect themselves and
others around them are subject to the unvaccinated worker who can freely infect
fellow workers, even some who may be immuno-compromised, and face no
consequences.
Now, following Trump’s presidency and its one-year aftermath, the
prominently white GOP is essentially an autocratic movement. A majority of
Republican voters, contrary to all evidence, believe Trump’s lie that Joe Biden
stole the election. In some of the state’s the party controls,
Republicans enacted laws
that allow one person or a small group of persons to decide the winners of
elections no matter the will of the people or the principles of the
Constitution. GOP Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis wants to create an election
police force answerable to him.
As history shows, autocracies never serve the people and certainly never end
well. Autocratic leaders are consumed with serving themselves, regardless of the
damage to their nation. Just look at what Vladimir Putin has done to Russia and
some of his neighbors like Ukraine. Look at what two of the world’s most
notorious autocrats – Hitler and Mussolini – did to Germany and Italy. Look what
Saddam Hussein did to Iraq.
The Founding Fathers chose democracy because –
contrary to Trump’s “I alone can fix it” claim – one person cannot effectively
lead a nation without advice, consent and compromise with voters and their
chosen representatives. The three-branch system – executive, legislative and
judicial – ensures checks and balances. There is neither checks nor balances in
an autocracy.
A word to the pro-autocratic forces moving to re-make America,
keep in mind that no autocratic ruler has proven honest or wise, just harmful
and destructive.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)